Skip to main content

Why Asian American theology sucks

Well, it actually does not suck. Something that doesn't exist cannot suck. Its kind of like saying Shrek 7 sucks. And yet it probably would suck if it had been made.

In any case, the real question is why there isn't any Asian American theology. If you're a good Evangelical, Asian or otherwise, you're reading this thinking "Why would we need an Asian American Theology? What is the point? What could that possibly offer to Western Christianity?" And the reasons why we don't have a theology and why we need one are exactly what Amos Yong sets out to explain in this talk. Major props and big thanks to Tim Tseng and Grace Hsiao of ISAAC for highlighting this and the great discussion about this topic over the past year.

The talk is academically oriented. Big words and long sentences. Its only 21 minutes though - much shorter than the gospel coalition messages so its got that going for it.

Here's what got me thinking: Asian Americans are long way from doing own theology because 1) We are way gun shy and risk averse. He's calls it "double-conservatism". We're conservative because Asian culture is conservative in nature and conservative because Evangelicalism is also inherently conservative. 2) We are taught culture is bad and must be "redeemed" in Christ in order to be good. Therefore, my Asian-ness is something Jesus must overcome so I can be saved (I often preach like this - being derogatory towards Chinese culture) 3) We don't like to disagree with the white guys who taught us in seminaries. Everything we are taught in seminary comes from a Western perspective that separates gospel and theology from culture. Culture is simply an obstacle that must be overcome. Evangelical is ahistorical, acontextual because theology is done. Amos says this is not the case.

And here's my takeaway: We have spent too long separating culture from theology. We have spent too long critiquing our culture but not seeing how our culture reveals Christ in a sharper, more distinct way. Certainly culture is something Jesus overcomes but what if He redeems through and in the midst of culture? Perhaps our shame-based culture can actually help us see Christ? Perhaps being Asian helps me understand atonement as not just an individual, private transaction but also as a public act of restoration into community? More to come. . .


  1. Very cool! Lets keep this going!

  2. Can I invite you to develop these thoughts further and possibly find an outlet for them on a new community blog site Your last paragraph gives two great prompts:

    How does a shame-based culture view Christ/atonement/discipleship/community?

    How does the Asian perspective of restoration as a public act of community fulfill Biblical precedent?

    I would invite you and any others interested to find out more and share with us (Westerners included) so that we can learn more authentically from each other.


  3. your last comment begs the question, 'but isn't Christianity already meshed in culture? that is the culture of western europe?' I think most people think that when, say, an Asian American theologian writes about theology while pointing to specificity of his/her context the reader often assumes that it's because the writer is engaged in a provincialized, local, and contextualize theology but leaves unquestioned that any and all theology is always already rooted in culture even European Christianity.
    Interesting blog and you raise many great questions.
    I consider myself an Asian American theologian and do not think that Asian American theologies 'suck.' There are plenty of excellent As Am theologies out there. If you'd like info please look up, Kwok Pui Lan, Anne Joh, Grace Cho, Rita Nakashima Brock, JungHa Kim, Su Pak, Nami Kim, Jakakiran Sebastian, Minah Cho, Christine Pae, Uriah Kim, Frank Yamada, Jeffrey Kuan, Patrick Cheng, etc. The list goes on and on. HOpe you find conversation partners who are open to engaging these wonderful questions! Peace.

    1. thanks for the feedback. that is a lot of people to check out. anyone I should start with?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra

Unsolvable Problems in Marriage I: Lowering Expectations

Different expectations of conflict From a recent Facebook post: Working on a post about unsolvable problems in marriage: For those who have been married five or more years, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much expectation did you have entering into marriage that communication could resolve any conflict between you and your spouse? How would you rate that expectation now? People often enter into marriage thinking that most if not all their conflicts can be resolved. Women come into marriage thinking "I can make my husband a better man". Men come into marriage thinking, "My wife will learn to see things my way". This idealistic view of marriage does not survive contact with the enemy. Even for couples for whom the first years of marriage are conflict-free, raising children is its own brand of unsolvable problem. And then there's sickness and mental health issues, job changes, unemployment, moving, and shifts in friendships. Conflict in marriage is inevitable. A number