Skip to main content

What George Washington teaches us about reading the Bible

This post is dedicated to Fred Gilham whose paper inspired this idea.

When you look at a painting, it can take a moment to determine its centerpiece. In this 1851 work by Emmanuel Leutze, it’s pretty clear. The centerpiece is not the boat or the river of ice. It’s not the men rowing or the guy holding the flag. It’s not the guy holding his hat or the guy steering the boat.

It’s the man standing in the center, rising up higher and straighter than anyone else. George Washington. He is the center of the picture.

He makes up only a small portion of the surface area of the painting. But the picture would not be meaningful without him. He’s the one who made the decision to cross the Delaware River in the middle of the night in order to surprise the Hessian army (artistic license made it a daytime crossing). He’s the one who led his exhausted troops through the freezing cold on that Christmas evening in 1776. The credit for victory in the Battle of Trenton goes to him. All the elements of the story come together because of him.

By contrast, the centerpiece of the Bible is obscured. Most people read the Bible as a disparate collection of stories and rules. It’s a jumble of conflicting accounts, moral fables, arbitrary regulations, and senseless violence. The stories don’t seem related. Themes do not span across authors or books. The God of the Old Testament is vindictive and cruel whereas the God of the New Testament is gentle and patient. And that’s only what Christians think.

One method of determining the main point of a book is to look at its ending. In Revelation, Jesus ascends to the throne of earth and is united with his bride, the church. The New Jerusalem will have a tree of life in its center (an echo from Genesis) but there will be no temple because Jesus is the temple. By this method and others, Jesus is the centerpiece of the Bible. He is the gracious redeemer who rescues and transforms a corrupt and undeserving people.

The Bible concerns the grace of Jesus Christ. The Old Covenant, with its rules and regulations, is the backdrop. It’s the ice and freezing water of the Delaware River. It’s the ominous skies. It’s the obstacle that is meant to be broken through. The Old Covenant takes up much of the surface area of the Bible but it makes what Jesus did meaningful.

If Jesus is the centerpiece, the challenge is determining how the rest of scripture points to Him. It’s not hard to make connections with broad strokes. But it’s much tougher when you dig down into the details. Yet we rest assured, for in all our study, we know how the story ends and who the centerpiece is.

So the next time you’re reading the Bible and you're lost in some ice floe in Leviticus or the clouds of Lamentations, remember the point of the picture. Examine the text carefully but don’t lose sight of how the story ends and who the backdrop is pointing to.

Comments

  1. Hi Fred! I love this post! I was thinking about the idea of the OT as an elaborate build-up for Jesus on Good Friday. Because I was reading through Leviticus and Deuteronomy, and all the parts describing the tabernacle and the measurements and everything. God devotes a LOT of text to constructing this image of who He is. And in Matthew's account of Jesus' death, there's that one phrase, where it says the curtain in the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. I read that before Easter, and I got the sense of God's theatricality with it all. He spent hundreds of years building layers of meaning behind that curtain--just so that He could tear it in half.

    I hope everything is going well at SV! I read the youth group emails every week still, and I wish I could be there to join in the fun :D

    Elanor

    ReplyDelete
  2. Elanor, I appreciate the encouragement! I also wonder if the law and the curtain is also more than a backdrop - that somehow it must reflect something about the nature of God. That's kind of a reformed perspective but it seems kinda lame to build something up only to tear it down - unless the former was meant to point us towards the latter.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra

Unsolvable Problems in Marriage I: Lowering Expectations

Different expectations of conflict From a recent Facebook post: Working on a post about unsolvable problems in marriage: For those who have been married five or more years, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much expectation did you have entering into marriage that communication could resolve any conflict between you and your spouse? How would you rate that expectation now? People often enter into marriage thinking that most if not all their conflicts can be resolved. Women come into marriage thinking "I can make my husband a better man". Men come into marriage thinking, "My wife will learn to see things my way". This idealistic view of marriage does not survive contact with the enemy. Even for couples for whom the first years of marriage are conflict-free, raising children is its own brand of unsolvable problem. And then there's sickness and mental health issues, job changes, unemployment, moving, and shifts in friendships. Conflict in marriage is inevitable. A number