Skip to main content

Crazy Rich Asians Movie: Filial Piety wrapped in Social Hierarchy with pinches of Feminine Self-Empowerment

*Spoiler alert” This review is full of spoilers. Watch the movie first.

Sometimes you watch a movie and it feels like coming home. No, not coming home to the palatial mansion Nick Young spent his childhood in but the familiar refuge of people who get you - who understand and accept your idiosyncrasies and love you regardless. 

What makes Jon M. Chu’s Crazy Rich Asians movie so enjoyable is the subtle and over-the-top ways it captures the diversity and nuance of Chinese culture. Nothing speaks home more than food and music. Cuisine plays a pivotal role in the film, and though most of the characters are absurdly affluent, the night market food scene and dumpling-making scene resonated strongly with me. Those moments were relatable on many levels. Asians of all socioeconomic classes are familiar with night markets and sitting around a table making dumplings. Food is comfort and the ultimate nostalgia. I’m reminded of Pixar’s Ratatouille, when callous food critic Anton Ego bites into Remy’s dish and is instantly transported back to his childhood. 

To see the food was to journey back in time to the table at my parents’ house and listen to my grandma criticize my misshapen dough balls. She would warn me that poorly pinched dumplings would open up during boiling and inevitably, some would. I defended myself by claiming my brother made those. The tradition of making dumplings carries on in our household and both Judy and I must closely supervise our younger children to enforce strict dumpling standards and make sure my daughter doesn’t eat too many raw dumpling skins. 

Chu, from the Los Altos Hills, also kills it with the music. The soundtrack is ridiculous. Ren Sheng Jiu Shi Xi (1959) is a song I grew up hearing and instantly recognized, though I never knew what it was called. American pop songs re-done in Mandarin? Sheer genius and just another layer of symbolism representing the confluence of two cultures. The story of how Coldplay’s Yellow (re-done in Mandarin by Katherine Ho) closes out the movie is a story in itself. 

The core of the Chu's Crazy Rich Asians is filial piety. That’s the dumpling filling of the movie. Filial piety is respect for one’s parents, elders, and ancestors. It is distinctly anti-individual. It’s all about family and personal fulfillment is irrelevant. "All you Americans want is to be happy” is one of Eleanor Young’s attacks on Rachel. This is required territory because it is the defining conflict for Asians in the West. Any movie juxtaposing Eastern and Western cultures must address the intersection of collective and individual identity. 

The screenwriters, Adele Lim and Peter Chiarelli, did a fantastic job. I believe they succeeded in making the movie at least as good as the book, which is a near-impossible feat. In the book, the social hierarchy of elite Chinese is the central theme. The romance between Nick and Rachel functions is really just a vehicle for cultural critique of Singapore’s 1%. The movie makes elitism the wrapper surrounding the filling of filial piety but the theme still emanates strongly. The racist dimensions are blunted in the movie (the guards of Ah-ma’s palace are not ethnic Chinese) but still lurk in the background.    

The scene where filial piety and social hierarchy most viscerally collide is Rachel’s introduction to her boyfriend’s mom, Eleanor. The tension for this meeting has been building and the viewer knows it’s going to be ugly - it’s like watching a car accident in slow motion. It’s both horrifying and captivating and a poignant image of how Chinese dismissiveness works. It’s never about the actual words exchanged and all about tone and body language. The scene finds Eleanor managing her kitchen in preparation for the meal. A traditional Chinese woman rules the house and no room more so than the kitchen. She runs her staff like Gordon Ramsay.  Rachel’s introduction is an intrusion and the way Eleanor instantly sizes her up is telling. Throughout the interaction, Eleanor barely makes eye contact as she attends to more important duties than meeting her son’s girlfriend, who she obviously feels is beneath her and her son. I’ve seen this scene play out many times in social encounters between Chinese women, a calculated non-chalance that belies superiority and tacit disapproval. It’s tragically beautiful and Michelle Yeoh’s Eleanor hits each note perfectly. 

Feminine self-empowerment is the path Rachel takes to navigate through the maze of filial piety and social hierarchy. Peik Lim exhorts Rachel to apply game theory tactics and out-manuver her future mother-in-law in a game of chicken. The mahjong scene sets up like an old-fashioned Western gunfight duel except Rachel and Eleanor wield ivory tiles instead of six-shooters. A real Eleanor would not have stooped to take that challenge and this type of explicit confrontation is pure Hollywood. It doesn’t matter though, it’s an incredible scene. The game as a metaphor for their conflicting values is masterful.

The movie isn’t perfect. There’s gratuitous male eye-candy. We are seriously targeting the straight female / gay male demographic here and the film makes no apology for its asymmetry. I get it - so many negative stereotypes about the Asian male body so therefore let’s compensate. And yet men are objectified in this film and the mahjong scene can be reduced to two women competing for the hand of a man. I don’t mind the discomfort of the role reversal, seeing how much women have been objectified in the past. However, I’m not convinced flipping a bad script is the best way to value both men and women.

To that point, there are no positive husband or father figures in the film. Peik Lim’s dad, played by Ken Jeong, is pure comic relief. Nick’s dad is conspicuously absent. Colin and his groomsmen are foils - merely distractions and voices to keep him from Rachel. Oliver is social/cultural commentary plus comic relief. Lastly, Nick is all smolder and no substance. Really, Nick, you weren’t going to prepare your girlfriend of two years that you’re from an ultra-rich, ultra-crazy family? That strain on credulity could have been updated from the book. He evidences a remarkable lack of empathy after Rachel tells him about the dead fish incident - “What else happened?” and then immediately “Hey let’s do something together just the two of us". 

That’s why when Nick and Rachel are mouthing “I love you” to each other during the wedding, its easy to hold back tears because unlike Nick’s mom, I’m struggling to see how Nick is worthy of Rachel. Im unable to root for a flourishing relationship between an emotionally handicapped Nick and a courageously vulnerable Rachel.

In the end, this is a movie about Eleanor Young. She undergoes the greatest transformation and she has the most at stake. Rachel can find another man but Eleanor can’t find another son. In the brutal staircase scene, Eleanor reveals the pain of falling short of her mother-in-law's and as a result, she’ll make sure this potential daughter-in-law knows her place with the damning words: “You will never be enough”. This is the dark side of filial piety - the enduring shame of children who can never live up to the legacy of their parents and ancestors. In Chinese culture, one's elders cast a long shadow. 

The climax of the movie is the mahjong scene where Rachels decides to sacrifice winning by surrendering the winning tile to Eleanor. It is the perfect resolution to the conflict between individualism and community. Rachel, as an individual, chooses to sacrifice her personal fulfillment by giving Nick up for the good of the family. And then during Nick and Rachel’s engagement ceremony, we discover Eleanor, in giving Nick her engagement ring, has in turn sacrificed her insecurity for the good of Nicks future family. 

The viewer doesn’t see the workings of Eleanor’s transformation - only that it happens. We’ll find out in the sequels how that turns out. If it’s anything like the examples I’ve seen, a mother’s surrender of a child is a bumpy process and not a one-time decision. What typically happens is the mother’s sense of inadequacy is projected onto her daughter or daughter-in-law and that’s how generational sin is transmitted. The burden of shame and disappointed expectations are expressed through perfectionism and fixation on image and status. It is the classic example of the controlling mom and absent/passive father. Mother bear is wounded and the wounds are passed down. 

Thus Eleanors conundrum is the universal conflict every mother experiences. In surrendering her son, I hope Eleanor does not find her value in being a worthy daughter-in-law or in finding her son a worthy daughter-in-law but rather in her worth as a beloved daughter of the most high king. Instead of telling her Bible study girlfriends to read Corinthians without her, Eleanor would be wise to meditate on 2 Corinthians 5:17 - that she is a new creation in Christ. In doing so, Eleanor can rest - surrendering the two things she wanted most to keep: her son Nick and her mother-in-law’s expectations - because she already possesses what is of greatest value. Acceptance and belonging are the only crazy riches worth having. 

Comments

  1. It is greatly useful for me. i'll be actual to check verify inside the works anew particular
    Game Gold Diggers Adventure Game Break The Cup Toon Cup 2017 best online game

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks to your sharing, I can enrich my knowledge.These articles are exactly what I need. Thank you for your contribution to the community.
    best game Papa's Scooperia game Def Island Kick The Buddy online game

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have done a great job. I will definitely dig it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this site.
    bob the robber 4 japan online , fireboy and watergirl 4 best online games , mario banzai best online games ,

    ReplyDelete
  4. The examples below is definetly for instance glimmer brilliant. Each one of these insignificant issues are built utilizing wide variety of cornerstone knowledge. I spend time these folks a great deal
    miniclip games, a10 games to play, jogos para crianças

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very interesting blog. Alot of blogs I see these days don't really provide anything that I'm interested in, but I'm most definately interested in this one. Just thought that I would post and let you know.
    kizi Games free
    Jogo para menina
    friv com school

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra

Unsolvable Problems in Marriage I: Lowering Expectations

Different expectations of conflict From a recent Facebook post: Working on a post about unsolvable problems in marriage: For those who have been married five or more years, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much expectation did you have entering into marriage that communication could resolve any conflict between you and your spouse? How would you rate that expectation now? People often enter into marriage thinking that most if not all their conflicts can be resolved. Women come into marriage thinking "I can make my husband a better man". Men come into marriage thinking, "My wife will learn to see things my way". This idealistic view of marriage does not survive contact with the enemy. Even for couples for whom the first years of marriage are conflict-free, raising children is its own brand of unsolvable problem. And then there's sickness and mental health issues, job changes, unemployment, moving, and shifts in friendships. Conflict in marriage is inevitable. A number