Skip to main content

Just say no to your kids

I feel like I and my fellow members of Generation X must have grown up hearing "no" all the time from our parents. Somehow hearing "no" has seriously damaged our psyche. And it's the desire to compensate for all this rejection that seems like the best explanation for why it's so hard for us to say "no" to our children.

Ruben Navarrette touched on this recently in his article about the attitude of entitlement among the emerging generation. The mall Santa Claus doesn't ask if kids have been naughty or nice anymore. And parenting today is all about positive self-esteem. That means denying kids' requests or calling out their bad behavior is tantamount to child abuse.

This means we often practice appeasement parenting. If my daughter says she's hungry then of course, she gets to eat right than and there (even though she had dinner a couple hours, barely touched her food, while complaining the whole meal). I struggle with this on a daily basis. I'm  tempted to outsource parent-child  interaction to our electronic babysitters of TV, Wii, and iPad. I alternate from appeasement parenting (which gets them to leave me alone and assuage any guilt from being absent or neglectful) to irrational tyranny (which happens after I realize I've allowed them to treat me like a doormat).

I believe one way to find the balance Navarrette offers is to say "no" more than you say "yes". It is "no" that makes "yes" meaningful. Here are some principles of "no" that help make it work.

The less sense, the more "no": The less mature your child is, the more you often you need to say no. This is not solely a function of age. Our oldest son, age 11, makes infrequent requests that are usually thoughtful. For his 5th grade persuasive essay, he wrote about why his bed time should be later than 8:30 PM. We moved his bedtime 30 minutes later in response to that indirect request.  But we have been refusing our second son, age 8, since he was very young because the kid asks for everything. He even gave a Christmas wish list to his grandparents without our knowledge. And of course we turn down 90% of our four-year old's requests. He has no idea how his petitions impact the rest of the family and sometimes we don't have the time nor does he have the awareness to receive an explanation.  The biggest reason we refuse our kids' requests is attitude. They come to us with a list of demands. They issue ultimatums. They threaten and inflict violence. But we do not negotiate with terrorists toddlers. "No" is how kids learn that they are not the center of the universe.

Stay the course: I cave easily. On the third attempt, my perseverance gets worn down and the kids will be eating chocolate two inches from the blaring TV. But I'm getting better. I can make it through the sixth or seventh try. It helps to distract and change the subject. Say no and stand firm. Keep repeating the same words over and over - "No, it is time to get ready for bed". Don't cave in. Stay the course.

Be gentle and calm: There is no need to be like me and snap into irrational tyrant mode when refusing our kids' requests. You can gently and calmly tell them "no". This also helps us in observing what is really going on with our kid and what would be in their (and our) best interest at the moment.

Focus on the root issue: Often a request is your child's request is a veiled attempt to give you information about him/her. When our youngest son acts up, he is almost invariably sleep-deprived. We need to get him in bed earlier. My daughter makes unreasonable demands when she's not getting enough attention. We need to spend some individual time with her. But the root issue is typically not addressed by catering to all our child's impulses.

Say "yes" to the best: Saying yes to the best means you grant request where you know what they want is good and helpful not only to them but everyone involved. If you're not sure (and there's a lot of that), then it's better to first refuse or delay so you can think about it. It is better to first refuse and change your mind than to first accept and later withdraw your approval. I really need to work on that. I grant many requests out of laziness and appeasement (yes, you can play ball in the kitchen when the ceiling fan is on). Most requests are neutral and and then it's arbitrary whether we say yes. Whatever you say here, don't sweat it too much.

I pray courage and wisdom for each of us as we learn to say "no".

Comments

  1. I'm interested if this idea of saying "No" often also carries over into telling kids they are wrong. I worked for a tutoring company that trained us specifically to never tell the kid they got a question wrong. We were supposed to say, "Great job for trying! But actually that word is spelled with with an e at the end." The idea was to correct them without any of the negative connotations that come with "right" and "wrong."

    While I was in the training I wondered: does our positive encouragement lose its value for being ever-present? Is it bad if you tell your kids they're doing a good job even if they're not? Because then when they're REALLY doing a good job, you have no way to show them how far they've come.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Completely agree - the same principle can be extrapolated to right/wrong because the root issue is the same - the fear of hurting someone's feelings and the confusion that calling out someone's work or behavior as wrong is somehow an identity label. If it's wrong, call it as such. But the key is to do it an overall atmosphere of acceptance, affection, and belief the child can improve, grow, and learn.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

A Man's Review of How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk

Van Epp’s RAM Model helps men set the pace in dating relationships When a man learns ballroom dance, he takes the lead and his partner follows. If he’s dancing the tango, he maintains a strong frame - right elbow up, straight posture, and a firm but gentle hand cupping his partner’s shoulder blade. Once the music starts, he moves in rhythm with the beat and takes decisive steps. He sets the pace. John Van Epp’s classic tome, How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk is a ballroom dance guide for dating. It’s written to help men and women to determine the right tempo to pace their dating relationship. Though the book does not specifically address men, this Art of Manliness interview with Van Epp does. General relationship books are often addressed primarily to women, as evidenced by “jerk” in the title, which is a gendered term for men. In spite of the title, the book offers a road map for how men can lead in a dating relationship. There’s a strong case for affirming traditional

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra