Skip to main content

Condition-less Christianity

I helped the older Asian gentlemen put his backpack into the overhead luggage bin. I sat in the middle* and he had the window seat on our flight from London to San Francisco. It turns out he was an Oxford physics professor headed to Berkeley for a workshop. When I asked him about his travel, he told me he had visited the US too many times to count and he was always too busy to have time to sight-see. Later I praised Oxford as an exemplary institution of higher learning. He replied with a perfunctory "of course". After I told him I was a pastor, he kept calling me a priest and asked me about conducting mass. I couldn't tell if he was feigning ignorance or considered religion as beneath his superior intellect. 

I love talking to people on planes. I'm an extrovert and it's a captive audience. These situations are great opportunities to get to know people. Sometimes people aren't in the mood to talk and that's fine. They're also my favorite chances to share the gospel. Of course the person has to be interested but the fun part is figuring out how to pique someone's interest in Jesus. It typically happens through a complaint.

The toughest part is getting past the annoying aspects of a person (and the other person need to overcome the annoying aspects of me). In this case, the professor's arrogance was seriously turning me off. I had to find ways to distract myself from his condescending tone while also asking better questions that would help him to open up. 
 
When asked about his spiritual background, the professor claimed to have none, which is never true. In hopes of not explicitly offending me, he said he admired religion because it provided valuable guidance for how we should live. Direct questions about spirituality, especially when people find out I'm a pastor, are rarely effective in getting strangers to share their beliefs.

I finally got him going when I asked for an assessment of his current crop of PhD candidates. He commented that many of the overseas candidates were good at following instructions but lacked originality in their research. I sequed into asking him what he saw as the biggest problem in society today. He said it was the lack of morality, as exhibited by religious extremism like ISIS. He said the world suffered from a lack of fairness. If only the world was "fair" then we wouldn't have so many problems. He also made the common generalization that all religions teach people to be good but then observed that Islam extremism seemed to tends towards violence. From his standpoint, even Christian extremist groups tended to be more isolationist rather than promoting change through terrorism. We wondered together what the difference in the religions might be. Here's how our conversation continued:

Me: It seems that extremist violence often uses the rhetoric of justice and it's interesting that most Christians acknowledge that vengeance isn't a God-given right.
Professor: That's true - Islam teaches something about "an eye for an eye" doesn't it?**
Me: Yes, I've heard that. But as Christians we believe God's forgiveness is available to anyone, regardless of what he/she has done. 
Professor: You mean it's condition-less?
Me: Exactly. 

I've always used the term "unconditional" to describe God's forgiveness but "condition-less" works just as well. In some ways, it's more explanatory. I know the words mean the same thing but hearing it described with a different word made me think more deeply about how God's love reaches us without conditions, without barriers, without qualification. It was also insightful to hear someone unfamiliar with Christianity use a different word that helped me understand my faith better. It was awesome.

I also recognize our view on the difference between Christianity and Islam may be inaccurate. What I did find, after some Google research, is there aren't many clear explanations of how atonement works in Islam. Atonement is the process by which one's sin is forgiven. What was clear to me is atonement in Islam is primarily intrinsic to the person - emphasizing personal repentance and reparations for the sin. I did also notice the idea of justice and judgment is quite prominent in Islamic teaching. This emphasis appears in Christianity and Judaism but Jesus really messes this up. In any case, most of the stuff on the internet is Christians attacking Islam's understanding of the atonement and vice versa. I do wonder how a person can be capable of true repentance when evil is so pervasive and I look forward to future plane trips when a Muslim can help me understand this better.

*Sitting in the middle of a three-seat section is a great way to increase the likelihood of having a meaningful conversation. On a crowded flight, you have the opportunity to talk to two different captive people. However I'm pretty sure no one will actually follow this suggestion since the middle is the most uncomfortable seat and I got put there because I had booking problems.


**I didn't mention this but Islam, Judaism, and by extension, Christianity, all teach variations of this principle of justice but only Christianity has Jesus' corollary of turning the other cheek. 

Comments

  1. "I love talking to people on planes. I'm an extrovert and it's a captive audience."

    You're one of those people!!!

    Haha, just kidding (sort of :))

    The best part about this is that probably plenty of people were eavesdropping on your conversation, so it was many birds with one stone :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually middle seats are the best IMO. Window seats can get really cold, and the aisle seat's foot rest/storage space is smaller and you have deal with people walking up/down. Though I never talk to people on the plane...I just sleep the whole time haha.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually middle seats are the best IMO. Window seats can get really cold, and the aisle seat's foot rest/storage space is smaller and you have deal with people walking up/down. Though I never talk to people on the plane...I just sleep the whole time haha.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

A Man's Review of How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk

Van Epp’s RAM Model helps men set the pace in dating relationships When a man learns ballroom dance, he takes the lead and his partner follows. If he’s dancing the tango, he maintains a strong frame - right elbow up, straight posture, and a firm but gentle hand cupping his partner’s shoulder blade. Once the music starts, he moves in rhythm with the beat and takes decisive steps. He sets the pace. John Van Epp’s classic tome, How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk is a ballroom dance guide for dating. It’s written to help men and women to determine the right tempo to pace their dating relationship. Though the book does not specifically address men, this Art of Manliness interview with Van Epp does. General relationship books are often addressed primarily to women, as evidenced by “jerk” in the title, which is a gendered term for men. In spite of the title, the book offers a road map for how men can lead in a dating relationship. There’s a strong case for affirming traditional

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra