Skip to main content

Be unbalanced about grace

Moderation in all things, especially moderation. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
I was talking to a pastor friend of mine a couple weeks ago. He's always talking about grace. Grace this, grace that, grace with bacon, grace and sunshine, grace everywhere. Sometimes I get tired of hearing so much about grace. It feels unbalanced.

I want to balance grace with law.

I want to balance grace with restraint.

I want to balance grace with truth.

I want to balance grace with justice.

I want to balance grace with discipline.

Part of the problem is I'm not exactly sure how to define grace. The Bible uses the term in multiple ways.  Grace is often defined as unmerited favor, which means that God has a boundless affection for us that has nothing to do with our good behavior, performance, or effort as in Ephesians 2:8-9. And yet it's more than that. Grace is love that goes first. It is how God express His divine power and influence in our lives, as in 2 Corinthians 8:6-7. It's the expression of God's enjoyment of who are and now what we do. It's all those things. I'm not sure if I'll ever truly get it on this side of heaven.

The other part of the problem is thinking about grace makes me feel guilty. It's ironic I know. Reflecting on grace feels so hyper-spiritual. I feel like I should appreciate grace more. That's a lot of pressure. So I would rather think about what I'm doing rather than what God did. It's much easier to plan my dad and all my activities than feel burdened by having to know God's grace more. The irony is thick.

The last part of the problem is that grace feels like license to do whatever we want. It's as if grace is the Christian YOLO. It's the spiritual way to rationalize doing stupid and irresponsible things. Grace feels so amorphous when we want something that's concrete. It feels too open, too breezy, too free. We want something we can sink our teeth into, something that grounds in reality. And grace doesn't feel like reality. I'm more comfortable with restraint, truth, justice, and discipline as tangible, moral ideals.

I want rules to define the boundaries of grace. But it's actually the other way around. It's grace that defines the boundaries of rules. And I want balance because I'm uncomfortable with too much grace. I don't understand grace enough to built my entire life around it. And I'm more comfortable with law because I like rules. They provide structure to my life. Operating without rules feels like stepping out onto a balcony without handrails. I feel unsafe and that if someone pushes me over, I'll fall and it's a long way down. 

Jesus did not balance grace. He came to earth bearing grace and truth. Grace is not a yin and yang thing. There is no cosmic balance of grace in the universe.

We tend to set grace opposed to other things, as if grace and truth are two sides of the same coin. But there's a false dichotomy in there. Grace and truth complement each other and go together. Grace is not opposed to truth, justice, or discipline. It is grace that makes sense of the other virtues. Putting grace against truth, justice, and discipline is a wrong distinction.  It is the enemy who wants us to pit one good thing against another. Grace does not oppose truth, justice, or discipline. We can have gracious boundaries but in the end, it all points to the unconditional and relentless love of God.

But I do believe grace opposes law. The law (or rules) ultimately point to the grace of God. The law is not evil but it is insufficient and our evil consciences can make law an evil thing. But we don't balance law vs. grace. Every rule ultimately bows to grace. Grace is the highest virtue. Grace is trans-moral. God loved the world by giving His one and only son out of grace, not law.

If grace is important enough to become the organizing principle of our lives, how can we afford not to be unbalanced about it?

Grace upsets the balance of good and evil. It throws everything off. Jesus blew up the carefully constructed equilibrium of our lives so that everything we are and do is weighted, driven, and hurtling towards grace. In the end, it is grace that wins. Be unbalanced about grace.

And from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. - John 1:16




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

A Man's Review of How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk

Van Epp’s RAM Model helps men set the pace in dating relationships When a man learns ballroom dance, he takes the lead and his partner follows. If he’s dancing the tango, he maintains a strong frame - right elbow up, straight posture, and a firm but gentle hand cupping his partner’s shoulder blade. Once the music starts, he moves in rhythm with the beat and takes decisive steps. He sets the pace. John Van Epp’s classic tome, How to Avoid Falling in Love with a Jerk is a ballroom dance guide for dating. It’s written to help men and women to determine the right tempo to pace their dating relationship. Though the book does not specifically address men, this Art of Manliness interview with Van Epp does. General relationship books are often addressed primarily to women, as evidenced by “jerk” in the title, which is a gendered term for men. In spite of the title, the book offers a road map for how men can lead in a dating relationship. There’s a strong case for affirming traditional

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra