Skip to main content

Imagining Atheism as a Theology

If atheism were a religion like Christianity, what would be its theological tenets? 

My friend Eric suggested our poetry writing group and book club read How to Have Impossible Conversations by Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay as a way to have meaningful conversations in a polarized and divided culture. Since Eric is an atheist, our group likes to be upfront about the religious content of a book recommendation. To my surprise before I started reading, Eric sent an email apologizing for the evangelistic nature of the book. 

His email piqued my interest and I finished the book in a couple days. Reading Impossible Conversations through the lens of atheist evangelism was fascinating. This book offers helpful insights to anyone committed to promoting dialogue. And yet as I made my way through Impossible Conversations, I realized it was intended to help atheists convert believers, primarily Christians, to non-believers. Boghossian already wrote A Manual for Creating Atheists, designed to do exactly that. I have read many books equipping believers to convert non-believers but never one that equipped non-believers to de-convert believers.

Both books aim to equip atheists with conversational principles in order for religious people to examine how their beliefs are formed and embrace reason. Eric’s email helped disarm my bias against the authors because I thought of them as evangelists; not of Christianity but rather atheism. I wondered what might happen if I took their evangelistic fervor to the extreme and imagined atheism as a theology. 

Let’s start with three important caveats.

First, I recognize theology is a blatant misnomer regarding atheism. Atheism is DEFINED BY a lack of belief in god or gods whereas theology is the study of god or gods. They are inherently incompatible. However, the purpose of this thought experiment is to describe atheism in theological categories because it may help Christians understand how atheism operates.

Second, because atheism’s only non-negotiable is a lack of belief in god, the other tenets of its theology are either implications of non-belief or values commonly held by atheists, more specifically, the authors, and my friend Eric as well. After all, as Eric pointed out, Christians are atheists about all other gods other than their own.

Third, my description of atheist theology is a caricature. This is a thought experiment. I’m deliberately painting with broad strokes to make a point about both atheism and Christianity.

With those caveats in mind, here are four theological categories to describe atheism: 1) hamartialogy: the study of sin and evil 2) soteriology: the study of salvation 3) eschatology: the study of the end times 4) biblical theology: the study of sacred texts

Hamartialogy: How does atheism define sin? Boghossian uses the term “street epistemologist” to describe an atheist evangelist. Epistemology is the study of the nature of knowledge, justification, and rationality of belief. It is the study of HOW we know WHAT we know. To hold a belief arbitrarily and against evidence is evil.

"Ken Ham is the perfect example of someone who cannot be swayed by facts. He believes the Genesis flood narrative literally and incorrigibly. . . Ham has explicitly stated that there’s no evidence that would cause him to revise his beliefs” pg. 139

The cardinal sins of atheism are deception and dogmatism. Ken Ham, a believer in the earth’s creation in six 24-hour periods and founder of the Creation Museum and Ark encounter, has eaten from the tree of unknowledge and his eyes have been shut. Ham commits both sins because he believes the world was created in six 24-hour periods solely because the Bible says so and against scientific evidence.

First, to believe an unexamined religious idea is to fall into deception.
Second, to persistently ignore evidence to the contrary of one’s belief is dogmatic.

What is so devastating about these sins? They mean a religious person can cling to any belief without regard to consequences. Perhaps most damning is a religious person will take pride in and receive affirmation from within his religious community for his obstinance and certainty.

Soteriology: How is one saved in atheism? Another way to ask this: how do atheists save their souls? An atheist is saved by reason. Man shall not live by bread alone but by every fact that proceeds from reason. Reason reveals itself through the incarnation of evidence.

"The most difficult thing to accept for people who work hard at forming their beliefs on the basis of evidence is that not everyone forms their beliefs in that way.” pg. 139

In atheism, confession involves the disconfirmation of one’s religious beliefs. Chapter 5 pages 147-169 are devoted to disconfirmation. Creationist Ken Ham can only be saved if he confesses his sin. Generating doubt is the seed of atheist “faith”. Disconfirmation's altar call is the question “Under what conditions could this belief be false?” Repentance means dying to one's old way of life - letting go of a belief system formed without reason, facts, and evidence - in order to be baptized into new life - the dynamism of an examined life based on the scientific method. An atheist is sanctified by a consistent, rigorous, and thorough evaluation and reformation of his beliefs based on emerging evidence. An atheist is born again every time he thinks.

Eschatology: What is the final historical event in atheism? Atheism's eschaton, its pinnacle historical moment, is the disappearance of religious ideas and their toxic influence on our society and culture. Allowing society as a whole to be guided by ancient religious ideas is evil. Religion also promotes racism and totalitarianism. Thus, the atheist New Jerusalem descending from reason will have streets paved not with gold but with progress. The new earth is eternal enlightenment. Other implications of atheism include: evidence-based values, morality detached from belief in God, and a belief in the inevitable progress of humanity.

Biblical Theology: What are atheism’s sacred texts? There is certainly no Bible. Atheists take pride in the fact that their canon is constantly expanding. Histories of atheism choose the Greek and Roman philosophers Epicurus, Democritus, and Lucretius as the first atheist writers. Recently the writings of the Four Horsemen (aka New Atheists: Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins) have gained influence. Eric was quick to point out many ancient atheist documents were destroyed by Christians. Nothing grows a church like persecution and atheism is no exception. Credible scientific research would fall into this category as well.

Conclusion: According to this thought experiment, two values I share with atheists is the importance of examining one’s belief system and having an openness to uncertainty. The study of how we know what we know is crucial in our day and age. One cannot claim to be educated without pursuing intellectual rigor and honesty regarding his belief formation. On this point, many Christians fail. Many Christians are de-converted to atheism because they’ve never examined their Christian beliefs and refused (or been prevented) to let their faith engage with reasons, facts, and evidence. In many evangelical circles, expressing curiosity and asking questions is akin to unbelief and skepticism. This is tragic. Though the wisdom of God will always be foolishness to the world (1 Cor. 1:18-31), reason and evidence are not our enemies and cannot be an integral aspect of our hamartialogy. Paul’s admonition to the church in Corinth emphasized an unpopular and offensive gospel, not one defined by unreason. We, the church, must better equip Christians to wrestle with uncertainty, skepticism, and science.

Besides thinking about atheism from a Christian lens, another purpose of this post is to rebuke self-centered thinking within Christendom. Eric told me Christians would accuse atheism of ultimately being a worship of one’s self. I would not disagree. I see atheism as the elevation of humanistic ideals as a projection of one’s self. Understandably, Eric does not see atheism as self-worship. Rather, he countered, worship of self is exactly what Christianity and other religions are - the projection of humanistic ideals on a so-called divine being. Either way, the point is instructive and important: Any and every person is tempted to fashion god or not god in his own image. Therefore LORD I pray: Deliver us from the gods or not gods of our own making. 


Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra

Unsolvable Problems in Marriage I: Lowering Expectations

Different expectations of conflict From a recent Facebook post: Working on a post about unsolvable problems in marriage: For those who have been married five or more years, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much expectation did you have entering into marriage that communication could resolve any conflict between you and your spouse? How would you rate that expectation now? People often enter into marriage thinking that most if not all their conflicts can be resolved. Women come into marriage thinking "I can make my husband a better man". Men come into marriage thinking, "My wife will learn to see things my way". This idealistic view of marriage does not survive contact with the enemy. Even for couples for whom the first years of marriage are conflict-free, raising children is its own brand of unsolvable problem. And then there's sickness and mental health issues, job changes, unemployment, moving, and shifts in friendships. Conflict in marriage is inevitable. A number