Skip to main content

Jesus is My Girlfriend and Moralistic Therapeutic Deism

Over the past week, I've heard several people make extensive use of dating metaphor to describe their relationship with God. Jesus is like a boyfriend. I recognize when people talking about dating Jesus - they mean there is intimacy, affection, and attention. These are natural parts of what it means to relate to someone. But part of it makes me uncomfortable. I understand the biblical basis of the metaphor - Ephesians 5 and Revelation paint a picture of Jesus as the groom and the body of Christ, the church, his bride. I have often preached on that image and its certainly a central image of the gospel. But its a little bit of a jump to go from there and say Jesus is my boyfriend (or girlfriend). Dating is a temporary status, is nowhere near as encompassing as marriage, and has no biblical foundation of commitment. Additionally, our betrothal and marriage to Jesus is community to one not 1:1. It is the entire community - the people of God - who are Jesus' bride. Despite that, I'm usually okay with the use of the metaphor because it helps underscore the deeper significance of marriage. Ultimately marriage is about communion with God. Each and every relationship with another person is a reflection of our connection with the Creator.

But what bothers me go deeper than the dating vs. marriage distinction. I'm reading Christian Smith's Soul Searching - its a comprehensive research survey book about the spiritual lives of American teenagers. Its dense and not easy to read but chapter 4 is worth further study. Smith defines a new religious outlook culled from hundreds of interviews that he calls Moralistic Therapeutic Deism (MTD). This is not a stand-alone religion but more like a remora (those suckerfish that attach to sharks and other big fish). Its a parasitic religious belief system that gets life by sucking the life of something bigger. Smith says the five tenets of MTD look like this:
1) A God exists who created, ordered, and watches over the world
2) God wants people to be good, nice, and fair to each other, as taught by all the world religions
3) The central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself
4) God does not need to be involved in one's except when He is needed to resolve a problem
5) Good people go to heaven when they die

So you might be an MTD Christian or MTD Jew and you would never call it that but the way you describe faith and live it out in your life, that's exactly what it is. In interviews about religion, teenagers used the term "feel happy" over 2,000 times. Smith says "God is like a combination Divine Butler and Cosmic Therapist" (165). One interesting aspect of MTD is you'll never get in a religious disagreement because you'll probably never have a religious discussion with someone and if you do, you'll just say its ok to believe whatever as long as it helps you be a good person and be happy. That's pretty much the core of MTD, "believe whatever you want about God as long as it makes you happy.

So when we say Jesus is my girlfriend, do we mean we are in relationship with Jesus because he makes us happy? And if that pretty much sums up the relationship - he shows up whenever I'm down so he make me help feel better, then its not Jesus you believe in. I sense many teenagers view dating relationships in a utilitarian way but that's a far cry from us being the bride of Christ. Jesus is not the boyfriend who does whatever you tell him to do, in fact its quite the opposite. You wouldn't be with him unless you surrendered everything. Grace is received by surrender. It cannot be earned nor demanded nor even entitled. You can only come to him offering everything. Happiness and morality are secondary to repentance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Dad's Review of Passport 2 Purity

[3,100 words, 11 minute read] The sex talk is one of the most dreaded conversations parents anticipate having with their children. To make things easier, an entire industry exists to help parents with sex education. Dozens of books have been written to help parents navigate this treacherous topic with their progeny. One of the best known among evangelicals is called the Passport 2 Purity Getaway package . It is produced by FamilyLife, a division of Cru (former Campus Crusade for Christ) and consists of a five lecture CD package including a journal and exercises designed as a weekend retreat for a pre-pubescent child and his/her parent(s). Passport 2 Purity was not my initiative. Our trip came about because Judy had heard from several home-schooling mom friends how they had taken their daughters on a road trip to go through the CDs. She even heard how a mom took a trip with husband and two sons to through the curriculum. So a couple months ago, Judy suggested we take our two older boy

Asian American Divorce Rate

I can't find recent data. Most of the stuff is at least five years old but by these estimates, the Asian American divorce rate is about 5%. I've got research from 2002 , 2008 for Asian Americans, and 2008 for Chinese Americans. The latest census data do not break out by race. In any case, a 5% divorce rate is about half the national average. Less divorce is a good thing. I would imagine that divorce does not bode well for personal fulfillment and many studies have shown it has a negative impact on children (too lazy to cite all the sources here). Of course, as one source argues, a lower divorce rate does not equate to a healthy marriage. There can be all kinds of abuse, dysfunction, and strife within marriage. All in all though, a lower divorce rate is one advantage of late marriage for Asian American men (and women). However, I believe a lower divorce rate is correlated with later marriage and there is no causation between the two. People who tend to be conservative,

Why Asians Run Slower

My brother got me David Epstein's book The Sports Gene . It is a fascinating quick read. If you're interested in sports and science, it will enthrall you.  I finished it in three days. Epstein's point is that far more of an athlete's performance is due to genetics than due to the so-called "10,000 hour" rule promulgated by books such as Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell and Talent is Overrated by Geoff Colvin (both which are very good). The 10,000 hour rule states that any person can reach expert level of performance in a sport if they devote 10,000 hours of deliberate and intentional practice.  That's a lot of hours. Most people aren't capable of anywhere close. And that's precisely Epstein's point. Someone who devotes 10,000 hours of sport-specific practice is likely genetically gifted for the sport in extraordinary ways AND genetically gifted in their ability to persevere and benefit from practice. Therefore, a person who can pra